Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Coal‐Fired Electricity Generation

By M. Whitaker, G. Heath, P. O'Donoughue, M. Vorum. 2012

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This systematic review and harmonization of life cycle assessments (LCAs) of utility‐scale coal‐fired electricity generation systems focuses on reducing variability and clarifying central tendencies in estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Screening 270 references for quality LCA methods, transparency, and completeness yielded 53 that reported 164 estimates of life cycle GHG emissions. These estimates for subcritical pulverized, integrated gasification combined cycle, fluidized bed, and supercritical pulverized coal combustion technologies vary from 675 to 1,689 grams CO2‐equivalent per kilowatt‐hour (g CO2‐eq/kWh) (interquartile range [IQR]= 890–1,130 g CO2‐eq/kWh; median = 1,001) leading to confusion over reasonable estimates of life cycle GHG emissions from coal‐fired electricity generation. By adjusting published estimates to common gross system boundaries and consistent values for key operational input parameters (most importantly, combustion carbon dioxide emission factor [CEF]), the meta‐analytical process called harmonization clarifies the existing literature in ways useful for decision makers and analysts by significantly reducing the variability of estimates (−53% in IQR magnitude) while maintaining a nearly constant central tendency (−2.2% in median). Life cycle GHG emissions of a specific power plant depend on many factors and can differ from the generic estimates generated by the harmonization approach, but the tightness of distribution of harmonized estimates across several key coal combustion technologies implies, for some purposes, first‐order estimates of life cycle GHG emissions could be based on knowledge of the technology type, coal mine emissions, thermal efficiency, and CEF alone without requiring full LCAs. Areas where new research is necessary to ensure accuracy are also discussed.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c058e0fde50dc009ff1d239e072453dfef3c92ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

  1. G. P. Peters
  2. Sangwon Suh
  3. K. Caldeira
  4. Edgar G. Hertwich
  5. Jordan Macknick
  6. James R. Meldrum
  7. Syndi L. Nettles-Anderson
  8. Christian Bauer

In Pollution

  1. Jordan Macknick
  2. James R. Meldrum
  3. Syndi L. Nettles-Anderson
  4. G. Heath
  5. Edgar G. Hertwich

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. Sangwon Suh
  2. K. Caldeira
  3. Edgar G. Hertwich
  4. Christian Bauer
  5. Jeroen B. Guinée
  6. G. P. Peters
  7. T. Wiedmann
  8. Richard Wood

Citations in the corpus