Freebase: A Shared Database of Structured General Human Knowledge
By Kurt Dewitt Bollacker, Robert Cook, Patrick Tufts. 2007
279 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Knowledge Graphs & Representation
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Knowledge Graphs & Representation
- Wook-Shin Han
- Si Wei
- Patrick Lewis
- Thomas Demeester
- Phil Blunsom
- Xindong Wu
- Zhenhua Ling
- Byeong-Hoon So
Citations in the corpus
- Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformer (2022, background): “Pioneering hand-curated efforts (Lenat, 1995; Miller, 1995) have been followed by web-powered knowledge graphs (Auer et al., 2007; Bollacker et al., 2007; Suchanek et al., 2007; Havasi et al., 2007; Carlson et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2014; Vrandeˇci´c & Krötzsch, 2014; Bosselut et al., 2019) that…”
- PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Them (2021, methodology): “KBQA A number of early approaches in ODQA focused on using structured KBs (Berant et al., 2013) such as Freebase (Bollacker et al., 2007), with recent examples from F´evry et al. (2020) and Verga et al. (2020).”
- A Survey on Application of Knowledge Graph (2020, background): “Nowadays, “Knowledge Graph” is also referring to semantic web knowledge bases such as DBpedia [4], YAGO [5], Wikidata or Freebase [6].”
- Knowledge Graphs (2020, unknown): “Many of the most prominent open knowledge graphs – including DBpedia [310], YAGO [505], Freebase [54], and Wikidata [542] – cover multiple domains, representing a broad diversity of entities and relationships; we first discuss these in turn.”
- Adversarial Sets for Regularising Neural Link Predictors (2017, methodology): “FREEBASE [Bollacker et al., 2007] is a large knowledge graph that stores general facts about the world. The FB122 dataset is a subset of FREEBASE regarding the topics of people, location and sports, and contains 9,738 entities, 122 relation types, and 112,476 triples. For both data sets, we used the”
- Differentiable Reasoning on Large Knowledge Bases and Natural Language (2019, background): “Freebase (Bollacker, Cook, and Tufts 2007) is a large knowledge graph that stores general facts about the world.”
- A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction (2023, background): “For example, DBpedia [40] (developed from Wikipedia) is a fundamental encyclope-dia knowledge graph, while Freebase [4] incorporates automatic extraction tools to obtain more content.”
- Natural language to SQL: Where are we today? (2020, methodology): “Some techniques also require additional inputs: an open-domain knowledge base such as Freebase [7] for detecting named entities; domain-specific dictionary/ontology; a pre-built mapping table between phrases in q nl and SQL keywords; WordNet [29]; and a word embedding matrix for calculating word…”
- An open-source toolkit for mining Wikipedia (2013, background): “They can either base their work on secondary structures that others have extracted from it, such as Freebase [2] and Yago [26], or they can start from scratch and build their own algorithms to mine Wikipedia directly.”
- Relational Memory-Augmented Language Models (2022, background): “Although Freebase relations have been observed to improve the performance on smaller datasets (e.g. WikiText-2; Logan et al., 2019) and particular domains (e.g. movies and actors; Ahn et al., 2016), we find that RELATIONLM with Freebase relations does not improve over transformer-XL on a much larger”
- Neural Natural Language Inference Models Enhanced with External Knowledge (2017, background): “…that in addition to relation embedding trained on WordNet, other relational embedding resources exist; e.g., that trained on Freebase (WikiData) (Bollacker et al., 2007), but such knowledge resources are mainly about facts (e.g., relationship between Bill Gates and Microsoft) and are less for…”