Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales
By C. Hohenegger, P. Brockhaus, Christoph M. Schär. 2008
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c04ca881480faf1f68407c02b5e51427b173137d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Hugh Morrison
- Jason A. Milbrandt
- C. Hoose
- Bjorn Stevens
- Wojciech W. Grabowski
- A. Seifert
- A. Korolev
- A. Fridlind
In Global and Planetary Change
- Hugh Morrison
- Jason A. Milbrandt
- C. Hoose
- Bjorn Stevens
- Wojciech W. Grabowski
- A. Seifert
- A. Fridlind
- A. Korolev
Citations in the corpus
- Large‐eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation (2017, background): “Thanks to increasing computational resources, increasingly larger domain cloud-resolving simulations are now possible (e.g. Hohenegger et al., 2008; Khairoutdinov et al., 2009; Love et al., 2011; Schlemmer and Hohenegger, 2014; Schalkwijk et al., 2015).”
- A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges (2015, background): “CPM climate simulations are able to improve climatological mean temperature at a height of 2 m especially in mountainous regions during summer [Hohenegger et al., 2008; Prein et al., 2013a].”
- Added value of convection permitting seasonal simulations (2013, methodology): “Hohenegger et al. 2008). The evaluation of spatial precipitation fields with traditional statistical methods (like correlations and root mean squared errors) often leads to a ‘double penalty’ problem, because modeled and observed precipitation may not match exactly in space and time. For example, if”
- Convection‐permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps (2021, methodology): “…simulation of convection with CPRCMs, the diurnal cycle of temperature and the diurnal temperature range, are usually improved with a CPRCM, especially in summer (Ban et al., 2014; Hohenegger et al., 2008; Keller et al., 2016; Leutwyler et al., 2017; Lind et al., 2020; Stratton et al., 2018).”
- Validation of the ALARO-0 model within the EURO-CORDEX framework (2015, methodology): “…modelling (e.g. Sun et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2014), some of these NWP models have been used in climate mode: studies by De Meutter et al. (2015), Hohenegger et al. (2008), Kendon et al. (2012) and Chan et al. (2014), where models with resolution at the kilometre scale are used without…”
- Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, methodology): “Convection‐permitting model configurations have also been used recently for regional climate modeling (e.g.,Hohenegger et al., 2008; Kendon et al., 2012; Prein et al., 2015; Rasmussen et al., 2011, 2017; Wakazuki et al., 2008), and it is anticipated that global convection‐permittingweather and…”
- Benefit of convection permitting climate model simulations in the representation of convective precipitation (2014, background): “Previous studies (e.g. Hohenegger et al. 2008; Brockhaus et al. 2008; Bechtold et al. 2004) recognised the parameterisation of convection as a major source of uncertainties and errors in simulating the diurnal cycle of precipitation.”