Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: An Overview

By Sarah Graham, Colin A. Depp, Ellen E. Lee, Camille Nebeker, X. Tu, Ho-Cheol Kim, Dilip Jeste. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2019

736 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology holds both great promise to transform mental healthcare and potential pitfalls. This article provides an overview of AI and current applications in healthcare, a review of recent original research on AI specific to mental health, and a discussion of how AI can supplement clinical practice while considering its current limitations, areas needing additional research, and ethical implications regarding AI technology. We reviewed 28 studies of AI and mental health that used electronic health records (EHRs), mood rating scales, brain imaging data, novel monitoring systems (e.g., smartphone, video), and social media platforms to predict, classify, or subgroup mental health illnesses including depression, schizophrenia or other psychiatric illnesses, and suicide ideation and attempts. Collectively, these studies revealed high accuracies and provided excellent examples of AI’s potential in mental healthcare, but most should be considered early proof-of-concept works demonstrating the potential of using machine learning (ML) algorithms to address mental health questions, and which types of algorithms yield the best performance. As AI techniques continue to be refined and improved, it will be possible to help mental health practitioners re-define mental illnesses more objectively than currently done in the DSM-5, identify these illnesses at an earlier or prodromal stage when interventions may be more effective, and personalize treatments based on an individual’s unique characteristics. However, caution is necessary in order to avoid over-interpreting preliminary results, and more work is required to bridge the gap between AI in mental health research and clinical care.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c041af0e08ccd1afb6b94e17e1da2539f5b34b7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Simon D’Alfonso
  2. M. de Choudhury
  3. John B. Torous

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Anind K. Dey
  2. Sarah Graham
  3. Bingsheng Yao
  4. Ho-Cheol Kim
  5. Mohamad Forouzanfar
  6. Shiva Maleki Varnosfaderani
  7. M. de Choudhury
  8. John B. Torous

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. John B. Torous
  2. Simon D’Alfonso
  3. Anind K. Dey
  4. Sarah Graham
  5. Martin P. Paulus
  6. Ho-Cheol Kim
  7. M. de Choudhury
  8. Ellen E. Lee

Citations in the corpus