Common Bond and Common Identity Groups on the Internet: Attachment and Normative Behavior in On-Topic and Off-Topic Chats

By Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena. 2002

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c03c8a705749b919adbbd359b308f92750e22199

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities (2006, background): “Social psychologists have distinguished topic-based (or identity) groups, in which members are attached to the group as a whole and the purposes for which it exists, from bond-based groups, in which members are attached to the group because of their friendships with other members [30].”
Normative influences on thoughtful online participation (2011, background): “Online contributions can be motivated, for example, by the individual’s perception of their level of participation relative to others [4] or their degree of identification with a social group [33].”
Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets (2008, background): “Such a common interest or purpose, combined with interdependence, suggests that book reviewers and consumers on Amazon may function as a common identity community (Prentice et al. 1994, Sassenberg 2002, Ren et al. 2007).”
Deep Twitter diving: exploring topical groups in microblogs at scale (2014, background): “For instance, [24] classiﬁed chats among users on a text-based communication platform into two categories – on-topic chats which centered around a common topic (examples of identity-based groups) and off-topic chats where people chatted on a variety of topics (examples of bond-based groups).”
Social influence: compliance and conformity. (2004, background): “…and are more likely to induce conformity to group norms than are common-bond groups (characterized by bonds between individual group members) when members are anonymous (Sassenberg 2002); some evidence suggests that the opposite may be true when members are identifiable (Spears et al. 2001).”
Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook (2010, background): “The transition of a Facebook profile from open to friends-only may signal a shift from a common identity orientation towards a common bond orientation [28,29].”
Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups (2006, background): “Sassenberg (2002) notes that attachment to particular others in a group can lead to commitment to the group as a whole and that in online groups this attachment is created through communication exchanges.”