Influences of habitat complexity on the diversity and abundance of epiphytic invertebrates on plants
By Hiromi Taniguchi, S. Nakano, M. Tokeshi. 2003
260 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c03410f51affc430d1cd916d81d1af74d2a06a70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Simon Wotherspoon
- Richard J. Ladle
- L. Kautsky
- K. Kovalenko
- Peter A. Todd
- L. Barmuta
- Tjeerd Joris Bouma
- S. Thomaz
In Environmental Chemistry
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Creating complex habitats for restoration and reconciliation (2015, methodology): “Using substrate designs with increasing D as a proxy for increasing complexity, such as tiles with “high-low lattice formation” (in Taniguchi and Tokeshi, 2004) or artificial macrophytes of increasing “fragmentation” (Jeffries,1993; Taniguchi et al., 2003), are therefore problematic due to these sca”
- Effects of macrophyte heterogeneity and food availability on structural parameters of the macroinvertebrate community in a Pampean stream (2011, background): “Nevertheless, an index of habitat heterogeneity should be independent of substrate area, as both parameters represent different environmental features (Taniguchi et al., 2003).”
- Habitat complexity: approaches and future directions (2011, background): “…terms used to define habitat complexity, the measures used to quantify it, and the scales at which it is quantified has limited our understanding of its role in influencing species distributions and trophic interactions (Downes et al., 1998; Beck, 2000; Taniguchi et al., 2003; Warfe et al., 2008).”
- Quantifying habitat structure: surface convolution and living space for species in complex environments (2008, background): “Furthermore, both these aspects of structure depend on the scale at which they are being observed and used (McCoy and Bell 1991, Taniguchi et al. 2003).”
- Distribution differences and active habitat choices of invertebrates between macrophytes of different morphological complexity (2011, background): “Complex plant habitats can reduce predation pressure by reducing predator feeding efficiency (Mattila 1992; Warfe and Barmuta 2004), provide protection against hydrological disturbance through reduced small-scale water velocity (Gregg and Rose 1982), and increase the food supply for invertebrates th”
- Macrophyte presence and growth form influence macroinvertebrate community structure (2012, unknown): “lakes and ponds) it has been demonstrated that acroinvertebrate distribution, is predominantly determined by he vegetation type, and more importantly, by the architecture or rowth form of the dominant macrophytes (e.g. Cyr and Downing, 988; Duggan et al., 2001; Dvořak and Best, 1982; Karassowska nd ”