Competitive regimes in forest-dwelling Hanuman langur females (Semnopithecus entellus)

By A. Koenig. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c02fac913e28cf2c84690feba79f9763019e8153

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Towards an ecological solution to the folivore paradox: patch depletion as an indicator of within-group scramble competition in red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus tephrosceles) (2005, background): “Fifth, contest competition has recently been documented both within and between folivore groups (Koenig 2000; Korstjens et al. 2002), suggesting that food competition can indeed be important.”
Effects of water level on sleeping-site selection and inter-group association in proboscis monkeys: why do they sleep alone inland on flooded days? (2010, background): “Ranging behaviors, especially sleeping-site selections, reflect the predation avoidance strategy in mammals though food abundance and distribution and are also the major influence on their ranging (e.g., primates: van Schaik et al. 1996; Koenig 2000; Artiodactyla: Teng et al. 2004; Brodie and Brocke”
Ecological models of female social relationships in primates: similarities, disparities, and some directions for future clarity (2002, background): “What exactly is meant by ‘clumped’ and ‘patchy’? These qualities of foods are rarely measured in the eld, and when they are, quantitative measures are extremely scale-dependent (e.g. Leighton & Leighton, 1982; Shopland, 1987; Whitten, 1988; Mitchell et al., 1991; Barton, 1993; Chapman et al., 1995”
Variation of life history traits and mating patterns in female langur monkeys (Semnopithecus entellus) (2001, background): “Extragroup males were occasionally encountered but permanent all-male bands were not found (Koenig et al. 1998; Borries 2000; Koenig 2000 ).”
Socioecological influences on the reproductive success of female mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) (2007, background): “In other species, the effects of feeding competition can depend upon seasonal or longer term fluctuations in ecological conditions (Koenig 2000; Wasser et al. 2004; Pazol and Cords 2005).”
Food Competition and Linear Dominance Hierarchy Among Female Chimpanzees of the Taï National Park (2003, unknown): “…that face more contest competition have a more linear and formalized hierarchy, e.g. Saimiri oerstedi versus Saimiri sciureus (Mitchell et al., 1991), sympatric Presbytis thomasi and Macaca fascicularis (Sterck and Steenbeek, 1997), and 3 neighboring groups of Semnopithecus entellus (Koenig, 2000).”
Red colobus monkeys display alternative behavioral responses to the costs of scramble competition (2008, unknown): “However, this cost may be difficult to observe if large groups have a competitive advantage in between-group contest competition, which may offset the costs of within-group competition (Wrangham 1980; Clark and Mangel 1986; Dunbar 1988; Janson and van Schaik 1988; Janson 1992; Koenig 2000).”
Competition for Resources and Its Behavioral Consequences Among Female Primates (2002, background): “Finally, in two populations of Hanuman langurs, WGC and BGC plus WGS predominated (Borries, 1993; Borries et al., 1991; Koenig, 2000; Sommer and Rajpurohit, 1989).”
Costs of group size: lower developmental and reproductive rates in larger groups of leaf monkeys (2008, background): “Recent studies, however, have found evidence for scramble competition in several folivorous species (Koenig 2000; Saj and Sicotte 2007; overview in Snaith and Chapman 2007).”
Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: the effects of contest competition (2005, background): “Even for a folivorous species, the Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus), it appears that when resources are clumped, high-ranking females have higher net energy intake rate than subordinates (Koenig 2000).”
Between-group contest competition for food in a highly folivorous population of black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza) (2006, background): “However, folivore food resources are not always abundant, evenly distributed, and of relatively low and even quality (e.g., Glander 1975, 1977, 1978, 1982; Hladik 1978; Milton 1980; Koenig et al. 1998; Koenig 2000; Chapman et al. 2003; Rode et al. 2003).”
Ranging Behavior of Proboscis Monkeys in a Riverine Forest with Special Reference to Ranging in Inland Forest (2009, background): “The most detailed studies of the control of primate ranging have usually concerned the distribution and abundance of food (Clutton-Brock 1975; Bennett and Davies 1994; Di Fiore 2003; Kirkpatrick 2007; Koenig 2000; Lambert 2007; Oates 1987; Olupot et al. 1994; Raemaekers 1980).”
Long-term dominance relationships in female mountain gorillas: strength, stability and determinants of rank (2005, background): “Amongst species exhibiting individualistic hierarchies, ‘age-positive’ dominance hierarchies should be inherently more stable than the age-inverse hierarchies of mantled howlers (Zucker & Clarke, 1998) and hanuman langurs (Borries et al., 1991; Koenig, 2000).”
Social dominance, seasonal movements, and spatial segregation in African elephants: a contribution to conservation behavior (2007, background): “1981), predation risk (Hall and Fedigan 1997), and energy budgets (Isbell and Young 1993; Koenig 2000).”