Time and Punishment: Delayed Consequences and Criminal Behavior

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Do They ‘End Up Together’? A Social Network Analysis of Self-Control, Homophily, and Adolescent Relationships (2011, background): “(2009), McGloin and Shermer (2009), and Warr (2007) have also been conceptualized as other theoretical constructs, including thoughtful reflective decision making (Paternoster and Pogarsky 2009), present orientation (Nagin and Pogarsky 2004), and problem solving (Nooney 2005; Parra et al.”
Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders (2007, background): “Or, they may not consider future consequences much at all ( Nagin and Pogarsky 2004 ).”
Fostering Patience in the Classroom: Results from Randomized Educational Intervention (2018, background): “Nagin and Pogarsky (2004) find that children and adolescents with high discount rates and low self-control (independently) were more involved in criminal activities.”
Personality Pathways to Impulsive Behavior and Their Relations to Deviance: Results from Three Samples (2004, background): “To the extent that impulsivity is at least an element of low self control, low self-control cannot be considered a unidimensional construct (see also Nagin and Pogarsky, 2004 ).”