Reward Estimation for Variance Reduction in Deep Reinforcement Learning
By Joshua Romoff, Alexandre Piché, Peter Henderson, Vincent François-Lavet, Joelle Pineau. 2018
45 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents require the specification of a reward signal for learning behaviours. However, introduction of corrupt or stochastic rewards can yield high variance in learning. Such corruption may be a direct result of goal misspecification, randomness in the reward signal, or correlation of the reward with external factors that are not known to the agent. Corruption or stochasticity of the reward signal can be especially problematic in robotics, where goal specification can be particularly difficult for complex tasks. While many variance reduction techniques have been studied to improve the robustness of the RL process, handling such stochastic or corrupted reward structures remains difficult. As an alternative for handling this scenario in model-free RL methods, we suggest using an estimator for both rewards and value functions. We demonstrate that this improves performance under corrupted stochastic rewards in both the tabular and non-linear function approximation settings for a variety of noise types and environments. The use of reward estimation is a robust and easy-to-implement improvement for handling corrupted reward signals in model-free RL.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sepp Hochreiter
- Thomas Unterthiner
- José Antonio Arjona-Medina
- Michael Widrich
- Michael Gillhofer
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Wojciech Samek
- Quoc V. Le
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
Citations in the corpus
- RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewards (2018, methodology): “It is possible to estimate r(s, a) separately via an unbiased minimal variance estimator like the arithmetic mean and then perform TD updates with the Bellman error using the estimated r(s, a) [103].”