Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: a comparison of upscaling techniques
By M. Christie, Martin J. Blunt. 2001
1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfe1597bfe624c57d78416dcfd83226ff2e1d2e1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Knut-Andreas Lie
- Olav Møyner
- Stein Krogstad
- Jørg E. Aarnes
- Vegard Kippe
- Halvor Møll Nilsen
- Bård Skaflestad
- Jostein R. Natvig
In Ocean Engineering
- Louis J. Durlofsky
- Jan Dirk Jansen
- Bjarne A. Foss
- Mathias C. Bellout
- R. Hanea
- M. Jesmani
- D. Echeverría Ciaurri
- Drosos Kourounis
Citations in the corpus
- Joint optimization of oil well placement and controls (2012, background): “The permeability and porosity fields are portions of layer 21 of the SPE 10 model [8].”
- Open-source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids (2012, methodology): “To illustrate the use of this grid, we have sampled permeability and porosity from layers 40–44 of Model 2 from the 10th SPE Comparative Solution Project [10].”
- A Multiscale Restriction-Smoothed Basis Method for Compressible Black-Oil Models (2016, methodology): “3 SPE10: water-flooding of the full 3D model Next, we simulate the full SPE10 benchmark case as described in [11].”
- Bayesian calibration of a large‐scale geothermal reservoir model by a new adaptive delayed acceptance Metropolis Hastings algorithm (2011, methodology): “…construct a projection-based reduced-order model for sampling a groundwater problem; and (6) in hydrology and petroleum, coarse models and upscaling techniques [Begg et al., 1989; Renard and De Marsily, 1997; Durlofsky, 1998; Christie and Blunt, 2001] are widely used to build reduced-order models.”
- An efficient discontinuous Galerkin method for advective transport in porous media (2007, methodology): “To asses the performance of the method, we will use geological data from Model 2 of the 10th SPE Comparative Solution Project [4].”
- Multiscale finite-volume formulation for multiphase flow in porous media: black oil formulation of compressible, three-phase flow with gravity (2008, methodology): “The permeability description is taken from the first layer of the Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project [ 8 ].”
- Numerical modeling of formation damage by two-phase particulate transport processes during CO2 injection in deep heterogeneous porous media (2011, methodology): “In this second application example, two two-dimensional permeability maps are extracted from the full three-dimensional permeability field used by the SPE-10 comparative solution project [24].”
- Use of reduced-order models in well control optimization (2017, positive): “The reservoir model is a modified portion of a channelized system presented in Christie and Blunt (2001).”
- A comparison of multiscale methods for elliptic problems in porous media flow (2008, methodology): “We first consider how the multiscale methods perform on a sequence of two-dimensional models with permeability data from Model 2 from the 10th SPE Comparative Solution Project [16], henceforth referred to as the SPE10 model.”
- Well placement optimization subject to realistic field development constraints (2016, background): “The permeability and porosity field for this case is a cut-off of layer 21 of the SPE 10 model [56].”
- Bayesian Reservoir History Matching Considering Model and Parameter Uncertainties (2012, methodology): “This test case uses layer 80 of the Tenth SPE comparative test case (Christie and Blunt 2001) as the reference permeability field.”