Funding the bud bank: A review of the costs of buds

By Peter Vesk, M. Westoby. 2004

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfd24fef8e56336d6ca889176b2b81100665f012

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Does disturbance affect bud bank size and belowground structures diversity in Brazilian subtropical grasslands (2014, background): “Costs and tradeoffs associated with maintaining buds are not well known (Clarke et al., 2013; Vesk and Westoby, 2004), but there are indications that a change in the disturbance regime of a vegetation type my cause changes in species composition, being related to the costs in terms of biomass and…”
Fitness and evolution of resprouters in relation to fire (2011, background): “There is a strong overall correlation between relative abundance of resprouting among and within woody plant species and fire frequency (Bellingham and Sparrow 2000 for disturbance generally; Clarke and Knox 2002; Vesk and Westoby 2004b; Fig.”
Sapling survival in a frequently burnt savanna: mobilisation of carbon reserves in Acacia karroo (2009, background): “stored reserves to support growth (Vesk and Westoby 2004).”
Fire interval effects on persistence of resprouter species in Mediterranean-type shrublands (2011, background): “…Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia resprouters, which regrow vegetatively after fire from buds protected from the heat of fire (by bark, densely packed plant tissue or soil burial)—although these are extremes on a continuum of responses (Vesk and Westoby 2004).”
Plant size and resprouting ability: trading tolerance and avoidance of damage? (2006, methodology): “Buds may senesce over time and it is conceivable that buds of different species differ in their longevity ( Vesk & Westoby 2004a ).”
To resprout or not to resprout: factors driving intraspecific variability in resprouting (2012, methodology): “Only in severe disturbances (e.g., extremely intense fires) the bud bank might be destroyed preventing plants from initiating the resprouting response regardless of the level of stored reserves (Vesk and Westoby 2004b).”
Handbook of standardized protocols for collecting plant modularity traits (2019, methodology): “Possessing a bud bank is considered an important strategy for plants under various disturbance regimes (Vesk and Westoby, 2004).”
Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration – A literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment (2007, background): “…sprout from plant fragments determine plant regeneration after disturbances differing in severity (Bellingham and Sparrow, 2000; Vesk et al., 2004b; Vesk and Westoby, 2004c), whereas seasonal fluctuations in the number of buds determine the response to different timing of disturbances (Piqueras,…”
The leaf size/number trade‐off in trees (2007, background): “…Kuppers 1989; Bonser & Aarssen 1994), or for replacing shoots lost to browsers, or lost because of physical forces (e.g. wind, ice/snow loading) (e.g. Vesk & Westoby 2004); (ii) having many leaves may spread out the risk of leaf damage by increasing the likelihood that at least some leaves will…”