Stellar ages and masses in the solar neighbourhood: Bayesian analysis using spectroscopy and Gaia DR1 parallaxes

By Jane Lin, Aaron Dotter, Y. Ting 丁, Martin Asplund. 2018

21 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We acknowledge generous funding from the Australian Research Council through a Laureate Fellowship awarded to MA (grant FL110100012)

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. I. Minchev
2. M. Martig
3. C. Chiappini
4. Matthias Steinmetz
5. David W. Hogg
6. Friedrich Anders
7. S. Majewski
8. Hans-Walter Rix

In Instrumentation

1. I. Minchev
2. C. Chiappini
3. M. Martig
4. David W. Hogg
5. S. Majewski
6. Friedrich Anders
7. Matthias Steinmetz
8. M. Hayden

Citations in the corpus

• Yule-Simpson’s paradox in Galactic Archaeology (2019, background): “7 by Lin et al. (2018) we estimated ∼ 0.013 dex/Gyr for age < 10 Gyr, while Vickers & Smith (2018) find a double peak at ∼ 3 and ∼ 8 Gyr.”
• Estimating stellar birth radii and the time evolution of Milky Way’s ISM metallicity gradient (2018, background): “We can see that well-defined AMRs with slopes steeper than that of the total HARPS-GTO data exist for stars with common birth radii.1 This may be the explanation for the puzzling flatness of the local AMR found for the past ∼ 10 − 11 Gyr (e.g., Edvardsson et al. 1993; Lin et al. 2018).”