Easy contextual intent prediction and slot detection
By Aditya Bhargava, Asli Celikyilmaz, Dilek Z. Hakkani-Tür, Ruhi Sarikaya. 2013
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Chenguang Zhu
- Michael Zeng
- Srinivasan Parthasarathy
- Nikhita Vedula
- Nedim Lipka
- Pranav Maneriker
- Ruhi Sarikaya
- Yu-An Chung
Citations in the corpus
- Towards Open Intent Discovery for Conversational Text (2019, background): “Progress in the field of deep learning has led to the emergence of models that can detect user intents [2, 5, 6, 11, 14, 22, 24, 31, 47–49, 52] and identify semantically relevant entities linked with those intents (slot filling).”
- The Technology Behind Personal Digital Assistants: An overview of the system architecture and key components (2017, background): “LU models are built in a contextual manner to solve this problem [15], [22]–[24].”
- SPLAT: Speech-Language Joint Pre-Training for Spoken Language Understanding (2021, background): “SLU has been widely employed in various areas such as intent understanding (Tur and De Mori, 2011; Bhargava et al., 2013; Ravuri and Stolcke, 2015; Lugosch et al., 2019), question answering (Lee et al., 2018; Chuang et al., 2020), and sentiment analysis (Zadeh et al., 2018).”
- Efficient Large-Scale Domain Classification with Personalized Attention (2018, unknown): “, 2017d,c) and contextual signals (Bhargava et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2016b; Hori et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017a).”