bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework

By Dominique Makowski, Mattan S. Ben-Shachar, Daniel Lüdecke. Journal of Open Source Software, 2019

1,222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Bayesian framework for statistics is quickly gaining in popularity among scientists, for reasons such as reliability and accuracy (particularly in noisy data and small samples), the possibility of incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis, and the intuitive interpretation of results (Andrews & Baguley, 2013; Etz & Vandekerckhove, 2016; Kruschke, 2010; Kruschke, Aguinis, & Joo, 2012; Wagenmakers et al., 2017). Adopting the Bayesian framework is more of a shift in the paradigm than a change in the methodology; all the common statistical procedures (t-tests, correlations, ANOVAs, regressions, etc.) can also be achieved within the Bayesian framework. One of the core difference is that in the frequentist view, the effects are fixed (but unknown) and data are random. On the other hand, instead of having single estimates of the “true effect”, the Bayesian inference process computes the probability of different effects given the observed data, resulting in a distribution of possible values for the parameters, called the posterior distribution. The bayestestR package provides tools to describe these posterior distributions.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bfa693e9b6f583983cd900d1ddfc0c779aa342a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Indrajeet Patil
  2. Mattan S. Ben-Shachar
  3. Daniel Lüdecke
  4. Dominique Makowski
  5. Philip D. Waggoner

In Information Systems

  1. Indrajeet Patil

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Indrajeet Patil

Citations in the corpus