An Economic Evaluation of Beach Erosion Management Alternatives

By Craig E. Landry, A. Keeler, Warren P. Kriesel. Marine Resource Economics, 2003

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Valuing Beach Access and Width with Revealed and Stated Preference Data (2008, background): “Landry, Keeler, and Kriesel (2003) use the CVM to estimate the value of various erosion management alternatives in Georgia.”
Valuing Beach Quality with Hedonic Property Models (2011, background): “All previous papers that have employed hedonic property models to value beach quality (Pompe and Rinehart 1995a, 1995b, 1999; Landry, Keeler, and Kriesel 2003) have interpreted parameters in a straightforward and conventional manner.”
Viewscapes and Flood Hazard: Coastal Housing Market Response to Amenities and Risk (2008, background): “Considering the spatial multiplier effect, the location within a SFHA zone lowers property values 10 Using a binary indicator for high erosion hazard areas along the shoreline, Landry, Keeler, and Kriesel (2003) find results suggesting that home prices do capitalize variation in erosion risk.”
The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services (2011, background): “…valued directly, there have been a growing number of studies that value the benefits gained from erosion control programs that either preserve or ‘‘nourish’’ existing beaches and dunes (Landry et al. 2003, Kriesel and Landry 2004, Huang et al. 2007, Whitehead et al. 2008, Morgan and Hamilton 2010).”
Some Consumer Surplus Estimates for North Carolina Beaches (2005, background): “McConnell and Tseng (2000) estimate the value of lost beach sites at $1.”