Statistical modeling of ecosystem respiration using eddy covariance data: Maximum likelihood parameter estimation, and Monte Carlo simulation of model and parameter uncertainty, applied to three…

By Andrew D. Richardson, David Y. Hollinger. 2005

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Whether the goal is to fill gaps in the flux record, or to extract physiological parameters from eddy covariance data, researchers are frequently interested in fitting simple models of ecosystem physiology to measured data. Presently, there is no consensus on the best models to use, or the ideal optimization criteria. We demonstrate that, given our estimates of the distribution of the stochastic uncertainty in nighttime flux measurements at the Howland (Maine, USA) AmeriFlux site, it is incorrect to fit ecosystem respiration models using ordinary least squares (OLS) optimization. Results indicate that the flux uncertainty follows a double-exponential (Laplace) distribution, and the standard deviation of the uncertainty (s(d)) follows a strong seasonal pattern, increasing as an exponential function of temperature. These characteristics both violate OLS assumptions. We propose that to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of model parameters, fitting should be based on

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf5b7fd4be15bf907efb3842a06ec6f40c1111ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Dennis D. Baldocchi
  2. Andrew D. Richardson
  3. Markus Reichstein
  4. Jens Kattge
  5. K. Savage
  6. Martin Jung
  7. David Y. Hollinger
  8. Eric Davidson

In Plant Science

  1. Jens Kattge
  2. Gabriel G. Katul
  3. Eric Davidson
  4. T. Huxman
  5. Russell L. Scott
  6. G. D. Jenerette
  7. K. Savage
  8. Dennis D. Baldocchi

Citations in the corpus