SUPERVISION REGIMES, RISK, AND OFFICIAL REACTIONS TO PAROLEE DEVIANCE*

By Ryken Grattet, Jeffrey Lin, Joan R. Petersilia. 2011

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf546ce048197b46bee32e426495710b3455da9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Suresh Venkatasubramanian
2. Kristian Lum
3. Angela Zhou

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Suresh Venkatasubramanian
2. Kristian Lum
3. Angela Zhou
4. Sarah L. Desmarais
5. Silvia Chiappa
6. Luca Oneto

Citations in the corpus

• It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks (2021, background): “94 For example, probation/parole models are subject to similar label bias issues, such as heightened 95 parole officer involvement or left-censoring when people go back to jail/prison for technical violations 96 and hence censor the possibility of re-arrest [25, 26].”
• An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Intensive Supervision on the Recidivism of High-Risk Probationers (2017, unknown): “Research on the impact of ISP has been largely consistent: Intensive probation, focused only on mechanisms of formal social control (e.g., Grattet et al., 2011), has little impact on recidivism.”