Additive manufacturing of biologically-inspired materials.

By André R. Studart. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf52dd22f607ed08981f6dca138a3c540b03b6e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. Zhao Yang
2. Lin Guo
3. Hewei Zhao

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Zhao Yang
2. Lin Guo
3. Hewei Zhao

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Zhao Yang
2. Lin Guo
3. Hewei Zhao

Citations in the corpus

• Processing nanocellulose to bulk materials: a review (2019, unknown): “…et al. 2016; Gatenholm et al. 2014, 2016a, b; Håkansson et al. 2016; Hausmann et al. 2018; Henriksson et al. 2017; Kokkinis et al. 2015; Kuzmenko et al. 2018; Markstedt et al. 2014, 2015, 2017, 2019; Muller et al. 2017; Nguyen et al. 2017; Siqueira et al. 2017; Studart 2016; Sundberg et al. 2014).”
• Nacre-inspired composites with different macroscopic dimensions: strategies for improved mechanical performance and applications (2018, methodology): “Moreover, the comparison of biologically inspired materials with those prepared using additive manufacturing was reviewed by Studart et al.(16).”