Satellite tracking highlights the need for international cooperation in marine turtle management
By J. Blumenthal, J. Solomon, C. Bell, T. Austin, G. Ebanks-Petrie, Michael S. Coyne, AC Broderick, Bj Godley. 2006
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf4ebc79769594ba2788de7cf57aa1a65d65bca0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Protected species use of a coastal marine migratory corridor connecting marine protected areas (2014, methodology): “…foraging sites were identified (and removed) by individuals slowing down and remaining in fixed areas for extended periods of time (minimum of 5 days; see Hays et al. 2010), using a combination of displacement distance and changes in speed of travel (Blumenthal et al. 2006; Schofield et al. 2010).”
- Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments (2008, background): “Indeed, as a result of many telemetry and logging studies on marine turtles, international cooperation has now been recognized as fundamental to turtle conservation (Blumenthal et al. 2006).”
- Ecology of Hawksbill Turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, on a Western Caribbean Foraging Ground (2009, background): “…abundant nesting by green, loggerhead, leatherback, and hawksbill turtles (Lewis 1940), migratory green and loggerhead nesting populations are now critically reduced, and leatherback and hawksbill nesting appears to have been extirpated (Aiken et al. 2001; Blumenthal et al. 2006; Bell et al. 2007).”
- Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species (2013, background): “Foraging sites were identified by individuals slowing down and remaining in fixed areas for extended periods of time (minimum of 5 days; see Hays et al., 2010a), using a combination of displacement distance and changes in speed of travel (Blumenthal et al., 2006; Schofield et al., 2010a).”
- Satellite tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where do we go next? (2008, background): “Ocean: ocean basin (W: west; C: central; E: eastern); F: adult female; M: adult male; J: juvenile; U: sex/maturity status unknown Godley et al.: Satellite tracking of sea turtles 19 E Atlantic Cape Verde 10 0 0 0 10 Hawkes et al. (2006) Indian South Africa 8 0 0 0 8 Luschi et al. (2006) W Pacific Hi”
- Sex-specific migration patterns of hawksbill turtles breeding at Mona Island, Puerto Rico (2008, background): “Whereas green turtles are specifically targeted by Nicaraguan fishermen, hawksbill and loggerhead turtles are mostly taken incidentally, i.e. when caught by lobster divers or in net sets (Bräutigam & Eckert 2006).”
- Migratory dichotomy and associated phenotypic variation in marine turtles revealed by satellite tracking and stable isotope analysis (2011, background): “Behaviour (post-nesting migration, foraging, migration to wintering area, wintering) was determined by inflection points in plots of displacement from the release site over time (Blumenthal et al. 2006).”
- Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review (2014, result): “This migratory behaviour is fully correspondent to that observed in other areas in female loggerhead (e.g. Papi et al. 1997; Blumenthal et al. 2006; Hawkes et al. 2007; Girard et al. 2009) and green turtles (e.g. Luschi et al. 1996; Cheng 2000; Craig et al. 2004; Seminoff et al. 2008), as are the…”
- Home on the range: spatial ecology of loggerhead turtles in Atlantic waters of the USA (2011, background): “These turtles are unlikely to be found outside the USA EEZ, potentially simplifying strategies for their conservation relative to populations of marine turtles that inhabit multiple range states (Blumenthal et al., 2006; Hawkes et al., 2006; Schofield et al., 2010a).”
- Satellite-tracking of female loggerhead turtles highlights fidelity behavior in northeastern Brazil (2010, background): “…areas start immediately after the last clutch has been laid (Stoneburner 1982, Tucker et al. 1996, Griffin 2002, Plotkin & Spotila 2002), and are typically nearshore (Papi et al. 1997, Luschi et al. 2006, Hawkes et al. 2007), even if a shorter deep-sea pathway is available (Blumenthal et al. 2006).”
- Behavioural polymorphism in one of the world’s largest populations of loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta (2010, background): “This is the third population of loggerheads, in addition to those of Japan (Sakamoto et al. 1990) and the Cayman Islands (Blumenthal et al. 2006), in which individuals demonstrate oceanic habitat utilisation during internesting periods, contrasting with other populations (e.g. Greece: Zbinden et…”
- Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data (2012, background): “2000) and has made important contributions to wildlife management and conservation (Seegar et al. 1996; Blumenthal et al. 2006).”
- Migratory corridors and foraging hotspots: critical habitats identified for Mediterranean green turtles (2015, methodology): “Such tracking studies often highlight the need for coordinated, international approaches (e.g. Blumenthal et al., 2006), and in other cases have demonstrated the efficacy of unilateral protection (e.g. Moncada et al., 2012).”
- Assessing accuracy and utility of satellite-tracking data using Argos-linked Fastloc-GPS (2010, background): “(2001) to justify the inclusion of LC A Argos-derived locations and the discarding of locations assigned LC 0 and LC B (e.g. sea turtles: Cardona et al. 2005; James et al. 2005; Shaver et al. 2005; Blumenthal et al. 2006; McMahon & Hays 2006; Cuevas et al. 2008; birds: Miller et al. 2005; Pinaud & W”