Site-specific versus pantropical allometric equations: Which option to estimate the biomass of a moist central African forest?

By A. Ngomanda, N. L. Engone Obiang, J. Lebamba, Quentin Moundounga Mavouroulou, H. Gomat, G. Mankou, J. Loumeto, Donald Midoko Iponga, Franck Kossi Ditsouga, Roland C. Zinga Koumba and 6 more. 2014

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf4439804d14158a1a974501496cd2f6e230a294

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Bonaventure Sonké
2. Vivien Rossi
3. Uta Berger
4. M. Henry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Bonaventure Sonké
2. Vivien Rossi
3. Pierre Couteron
4. Uta Berger
5. Raphaël Pélissier
6. M. Henry
7. Adeline Fayolle

Citations in the corpus

• Closing a gap in tropical forest biomass estimation: taking crown mass variation into account in pantropical allometries (2016, methodology): “Among these plots, 80 were from a network of 1 ha plots established in humid evergreen to semideciduous forests belonging to 13 sites in Cameroon, Gabon and the Democratic Republic of Congo (unpublished data)1.”