A multi‐trait test of the leaf‐height‐seed plant strategy scheme with 133 species from a pine forest flora

By D. Laughlin, J. Leppert, Margaret M. Moore, C. Sieg. 2010

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf1a4412b6a9a4cd166f384cc823b3ae9090aa26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Climatic constraints on trait‐based forest assembly (2011, unknown): “Shipley et al. (2011) also found that leaf traits, such as SLA and leaf [N], were poorly predicted from environmental conditions, even though SLA and leaf [N] exhibited considerable variation among the species in that study (Laughlin et al. 2010).”
Evidence for a ‘plant community economics spectrum’ driven by nutrient and water limitations in a Mediterranean rangeland of southern France (2012, result): “2012), but contrast with others where both types of traits, measured at the species level, were unrelated (Tjoelker et al. 2005; Laughlin et al. 2010) or even negatively correlated (Lambers & Poorter 1992).”
Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation? (2014, unknown): “…et al. (2009); Pakeman et al. (2009); Pati~ no et al. (2009); Poorter et al. (2009); Poorter (2009); Reich et al. (2009); Freschet et al. (2010a, b); Laughlin et al. (2010); Messier et al. (2010); Ordo~ nez et al. (2010a,b); Penuelas et al. (2010a,b); Willis et al. (2010); Wright et al. (2010);…”
A plant economics spectrum in Mediterranean forests along environmental gradients: is there coordination among leaf, stem and root traits? (2016, methodology): “…resource-use traits (associated with the acquisition-conservation trade-off), plant height (related to competition for light) and seed mass (related to germination, establishment and dispersal), are orthogonal, according to the ‘LeafHeight-Seed’ hypothesis (Westoby 1998; Laughlin et al. 2010).”
How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services (2012, background): “Recently, the applicability of this spectrum to other organs has been investigated, demonstrating plant-level co-ordination in resource economics (Freschet et al. 2010a; Laughlin et al. 2010), although relationships among plant and root traits are not confirmed generically (Craine et al.”
Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine‐root trait variation (2017, background): “In addition, local-scale studies suggest that differences among growth forms could also be seen for morphological traits such as SRL and fine-root tissue density (e.g. Freschet et al. 2010; Laughlin et al. 2010), even within the herbaceous group (Roumet et al.”
The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly (2014, methodology): “Here, I estimate the intrinsic dimensionality of three large species-trait data sets from three regions: Northern Arizona, USA (Laughlin et al. 2010); California, USA (Ackerly 2004); and Sheffield, UK (Grime et al. 1997).”