Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction

By Dan Simon, Keith J. Holyoak. 2002

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf0949058c7e0fd3f5d3ac5dd7cac835e36dd2c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. A. Glöckner
2. T. Betsch
3. N. Schindler
4. Magda Osman
5. Sanjeev R. Kulkarni
6. Yiling Lin
7. Richard E. Ashcroft
8. G. Harman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Magda Osman
2. Sanjeev R. Kulkarni
3. A. Glöckner
4. Yiling Lin
5. T. Betsch
6. Richard E. Ashcroft
7. G. Harman

Citations in the corpus

• Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics (2017, background): “…types of processes that can be classified as System 1 or System 2, in a PCS model, variations in processing of information is predicted and modeled according to the degree of restructuring that needs to occur for coherence (between knowledge and behavior) to be achieved (Simon & Holyoak, 2002).”
• The Problem of Induction (2006, methodology): “…2000) has developed a " constraint satisfaction " model of coherence based reasoning using artificial neural networks, a model which has proved fruitful in research in decision-making (Holyoak and Simon, 1999; Simon et al., 2001; Simon and Holyoak, 2002; Read, Snow, and Simon, 2003; Simon, 2004).”
• Coherence Shifts in Probabilistic Inference Tasks (2010, background): “Thus, shifts in validities cannot be entirely attributed to post-decisional reduction of dissonance (Festinger, 1964; see also Simon & Holyoak, 2002).”