Do Fund Managers Misestimate Climatic Disaster Risk
By Shashwat Alok, Nitin Kumar, Russ Wermers. The Review of financial studies, 2020
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We examine whether professional money managers overreact to large climatic disasters. We find that managers within a major disaster region underweight disaster zone stocks to a much greater degree than distant managers and that this aversion to disaster zone stocks is related to a salience bias that decreases over time and distance from the disaster, rather than to superior information possessed by close managers. This overreaction can be costly to fund investors for some especially salient disasters like hurricanes and tornadoes: a long-short strategy that exploits the overreaction generates a significant DGTW-adjusted return over the following 2 years.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/befe0a725678769bd890aff73675f3b1c93dcd5e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Johannes Stroebel
- Bryan T. Kelly
- Stefano Giglio
- Robert F. Engle
- Andrew J. Patton
- Tim Bollerslev
- Kevin Sheppard
- Christian M. Hafner
In Finance
- Bryan T. Kelly
- Stefano Giglio
- Robert F. Engle
- Johannes Stroebel
- Heebum Lee
- Andrew J. Patton
- Tim Bollerslev
- Kevin Sheppard
Citations in the corpus
- Hedging Climate Change News (2019, methodology): “We follow a dynamic hedging approach similar to Black and Scholes (1973) and Merton (1973).”