Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space

By Nienke Hoogenboom, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen, Robert Oostenveld, Laura M. Parkes, Pascal Fries. NeuroImage, 2006

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bee186c670267e0ba71243bd36d1c5758a7562f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Functional roles of rhythmic neuronal activity in the human visual and somatosensory system (2008, background): “2007) and high-contrast moving gratings (Hoogenboom et al. 2005).”
Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia. (2008, background): “Phase coherence between source waveforms is implemented in software packages such as BESA.69,70 Some have even argued that modeling source activity does not eliminate the possibility that 2 sources are spuriously coherent because they are contaminated by activity from a third source.51 Accordingly, ”
Gamma-band synchronization in the neocortex: novel analysis methods and their application to sensory and motivational systems (2013, background): “It has been shown, in primate occipital cortex, that human/primate subjects can have widely varying spectra, which likely has a genetic basis (Vinck et al., 2010a; Hoogenboom et al., 2006; van Pelt et al., 2012).”
Attentional Stimulus Selection through Selective Synchronization between Monkey Visual Areas (2012, unknown): “Between the two individuals, the gamma-frequency bands are distinctly different, as has been reported previously for animals (Vinck et al., 2010) and humans (Hoogenboom et al., 2006; Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2009; Swettenham et al., 2009; van Pelt et al., 2012).”
Alpha-beta and gamma rhythms subserve feedback and feedforward influences among human visual cortical areas (2016, unknown): “Visual stimulation and task performance induced grand-average power reductions in the alpha and beta bands and enhancements in the gamma band in many sensors (Figure 1B), consistent with previous reports (Hoogenboom et al., 2006; van Pelt et al., 2012).”
Theta and Gamma Oscillations Predict Encoding and Retrieval of Declarative Memory (2006, background): “gamma band activity and visual perception (Adjamian et al., 2004; Kaiser et al., 2004; Hoogenboom et al., 2006).”
Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. (2008, background): “While MEG may also be affected by eye movements (Katila et al., 1981), recent MEG studies have reported induced gammaband responses that were different in latency, duration, and distribution from the EEG findings (Hoogenboom et al., 2006; Vidal et al., 2006; Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008) and theref”
The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective (2012, methodology): “, event-related time-frequency responses (Hoogenboom et al., 2006) and event-related changes in synchrony within and across brain regions (Siegel et al.”
Rhythms For Cognition: Communication Through Coherence (2015, unknown): “Also, stimulus onsets lead to higher gamma peak frequency (Figure 6C), a phenomenon illustrated in many studies even though not often reported explicitly (Fries et al., 2001; Hoogenboom et al., 2006).”
Power-Law Scaling in the Brain Surface Electric Potential (2009, background): “Activity-related narrow-band PSD increases, correlating with fMRI [55], have been demonstrated in the ''high-c'' (40–100Hz) frequency range of the LFP [56–60] and the MEG [61,62].”
Spectral Changes in Cortical Surface Potentials during Motor Movement (2007, background): “, 2005), that (as we demonstrate here) high-frequency changes are a specific correlate of local behavior (Hoogenboom et al., 2006; Womelsdorf et al., 2006), and we postulate that they may directly reflect an increase in local cortical computation.”
Self-paced movements induce high-frequency gamma oscillations in primary motor cortex (2008, background): “Finally, it should be noted that gamma band increases within a similar 70 to 80 Hz frequency range have been observed in other cortical areas, such as the occipital cortex during visual stimulation (Hoogenboom et al., 2006).”
Top-down and bottom-up interactions rely on nested brain oscillations to shape rhythmic visual attention sampling (2025, unknown): “…through cross-frequency mechanisms [22–25, 28 ,45 Our results first confirmed that a continuous visual input, in the form of a moving sine grating [47], results in synchronization of gamma-band activity across the posterior brain areas, corroborating prior evidence that the feedforward drive of…”