ON HAWKING RADIATION AS TUNNELING WITH BACK-REACTION
By A. Medved, E. Vagenas. 2005
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Recently, Angheben et al.1 have presented a refined method for calculating the (tree-level) black hole temperature by way of the tunneling paradigm. Here, we demonstrate how their formalism can be suitably adapted to accommodate the (higher-order) effects of the gravitational back-reaction.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bedd62a31e2263f29ca2941fe3d8bc783ade5227
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Robert B. Mann
- R. Kerner
- Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
- D. Kubizňák
- Shao-Wen Wei
- Yu-Xiao Liu
- R. Banerjee
- Guqiang Li
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Robert B. Mann
- R. Kerner
- Bibhas Ranjan Majhi
- D. Kubizňák
- R. Banerjee
- Shao-Wen Wei
- Yu-Xiao Liu
- Guqiang Li
Citations in the corpus
- Fermions tunnelling from black holes (2007, methodology): “In various scalar field cases this is inherent in the Parikh/Wilczek tunnelling method [3, 7–18] and can be incorporated into the Hamilton–Jacobi tunnelling approach [6].”
- Charged fermions tunnelling from Kerr–Newman black holes (2008, unknown): “A 0 B 0 exp [ i ~ I ] we find upon insertion into the (chargeless) Dirac equation (5) we obtain −B ( 1√ f ∂tI + √ g∂rI ) +Am = 0 (33) −B ( i √ f FK ∂φI − i H√ FK ∂tI + 1√ Σ ∂θI ) = 0 (34) A ( 1√ f ∂tI − √ g∂rI ) +Bm = 0 (35) −A ( i √ f FK ∂φI − i H√ FK ∂tI + 1√ Σ ∂θI ) = 0 (36) Repeating the…”