Self-Organised Criticality: Theory, Models and Characterisation

By G. Pruessner. 2012

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems (2017, background): “…sizes of such avalanches turn out to be distributed as power laws, i.e. the system becomes critical without any apparent need for fine tuning16 (Bak, 1996; Bak et al., 1987; Christensen and Moloney, 2005; Dickman et al., 2000; Jensen, 1998; Pruessner, 2012; Turcotte, 1999; Watkins et al., 2015).”
25 Years of Self-Organized Criticality: Solar and Astrophysics (2014, methodology): “Many of the subsequent studies came up with different cellular automaton models, which produced a range of powerlaw slopes (see Table 1 and Pruessner 2012), some of them produced exact powerlaw size distributions over many orders of magnitudes (which demonstrated “universality” with regard to the…”
Fitting and goodness-of-fit test of non-truncated and truncated power-law distributions (2012, methodology): “…but also in condensed matter physics, astrophysics, biological evolution, neuroscience, and even the economy, is provided by the concept of self-organized criticality, and summarized by the sandpile paradigm (Bak, 1996; Christensen and Moloney, 2005; Jensen, 1998; Pruessner, 2012; Sornette, 2004).”