Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace

By Timothy Frye, O. J. Reuter, David Szakonyi. 2014

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bed54368014a67e5e895bc5b13f77496181a184d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Milan W. Svolik
2. Ashlea Rundlett
3. A. Coppock
4. Graeme Blair

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Margaret Moor
2. Milan W. Svolik
3. Ashlea Rundlett
4. A. Coppock
5. Graeme Blair
6. Gordon Pennycook
7. David G. Rand
8. Scott Clifford

Citations in the corpus

• When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments (2020, background): “Finally, Frye, Reuter, and Szakonyi (2014) highlights in the Russian case that respondents may have in mind their employer as a social referent, who may have special levers of retaliation.”
• Deliver the Vote! Micromotives and Macrobehavior in Electoral Fraud (2016, background): “…et al. 2013);30 that fraud was executed locally by operatives within the state bureaucracy, the public sector, and the United Russia party (Frye, Reuter, and Szakonyi 2014); that these operatives where motivated by the promise of a political or bureaucratic advancement or monetary…”