The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor

By S. Babb. 2013

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/becd4eb3d62010df516b51d93d20d7a754fb1e6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. L. King
2. Thomas Stubbs
3. A. Kentikelenis
4. Gary Gereffi

In Finance

1. L. King
2. Thomas Stubbs
3. A. Kentikelenis
4. Gary Gereffi

In Political Science and International Relations

1. L. King
2. Thomas Stubbs
3. A. Kentikelenis
4. Gary Gereffi

Citations in the corpus

• IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985–2014 (2016, background): “Over subsequent years, the remit of conditionality expanded further to cover a growing array of policy areas, including social policy, labour market reforms, and ‘good governance’ (Babb 2013; Chang 2006; Rodrik 2002; Serra and Stiglitz 2008; Stiglitz 2002; Stubbs, Kentikelenis, and King 2016).”
• Global value chains and international development policy: Bringing firms, networks and policy-engaged scholarship back in (2019, background): “…the ILO, UNIDO, UNCTAD and other UN development agencies were searching for relevance and policy space in an era dominated by the neoliberal orthodoxy of privatization, deregulation and free trade associated with the so-called ‘Washington Consensus’ (Babb, 2013; Babb & Chorev, 2016; Wade, 2003).”