Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship Between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being

By Jia Wei Zhang, Ryan T. Howell, M. Stolarski. 2013

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/beb08298bae55e2b197a87787e0f4a7c332fdfae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marcin Zajenkowski
2. K. Jankowski
3. J. Vowinckel
4. M. Stolarski

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Marcin Zajenkowski
2. K. Jankowski
3. J. Vowinckel
4. N. Fieulaine
5. M. Stolarski

In Social Psychology

1. Marcin Zajenkowski
2. K. Jankowski
3. J. Vowinckel
4. N. Fieulaine
5. M. Stolarski

Citations in the corpus

• Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application (2015, background): “For instance, Zhang et al. ( 2013 ) shown that correlations between Balanced Time Perspective and well-being may reach the correlational level of .60, and time perspective dimensions are better predictors of well-being than are any of the famous Big Five personality traits (Zhang and Howell 2011 ).”
• Mind the balance, be contented: Balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction (2016, methodology): “It should also be noted that the method we used to assess BTP is not the only one, though it is considered to be one of the most valid (Stolarski et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2013).”