Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry

By K. Karltorp, Björn A. Sandén. 2012

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Energy, Political Science and International Relations, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bea88804ac86633459f6a1df0c32889375fa8f7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Energy

1. Frank W. Geels

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Teis Hansen
2. G. Kungl
3. Markus Grillitsch
4. Marko P. Hekkert
5. M. Smink
6. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
7. Frank W. Geels
8. Simona Negro

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Marko P. Hekkert
2. Simona Negro
3. Frank W. Geels
4. Teis Hansen
5. A. Mossel
6. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
7. Markus Grillitsch
8. M. Smink

Citations in the corpus

• Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “…to be countered by deliberate efforts at ‘regime destabilisation’ (Scrase & Smith 2009; Turnheim & Geels 2012; Turnheim & Geels 2013; Bosman et al. 2014; Karltorp & Sandén 2012) then the scope of what constitutes the politics of transitions becomes significantly wider and deeper (Stirling 2011).”
• Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis (2020, background): “While many incumbent firms are resistant to change (Karltorp and Sanden, 2012; Smink et al., 2015; Steen and Weaver, 2017), some incorporate disruptive innovations in their operations and move into new industries to exploit new opportunities and engage in defensive maintenance strategies to avoid…”
• Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, background): “…are directed towards influencing the external environment of the firm (cf. Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978) and should be viewed as complementary to technology or innovation strategies by which incumbents develop a technology themselves (cf. Bergek et al., 2008, 2009; Karltorp and Sandén, 2012).”
• Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions (2017, background): “Even within a particular transition, incumbents follow different modes of behavior (Bakker et al., 2014; Karltorp and Sandén, 2012; Penna and Geels, 2012), and change between modes of behavior over time (Bakker et al., 2014; Berggren et al., 2015; Smink et al., 2013; Wesseling et al., 2015, 2014).”
• Sequence and alignment of external pressures in industry destabilisation: Understanding the downfall of incumbent utilities in the German energy transition (1998–2015) (2017, background): “…literature focus on emerging ‘green’ innovations, an emerging research stream is also addressing the flip-side of transitions, namely the destabilisation of existing regimes and industries (Karltorp and Sandén, 2012; Turnheim and Geels, 2012; Stegmaier et al., 2014; Kivimaa and Kern, 2016).”