Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.

By J. Lumley, S. Oliver, E. Waters, L. Oakley. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004

900 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. (2004, methodology): “Lumley, Oliver, and Waters (2002) performed a meta-analysis of 34 intervention trials during pregnancy and found that the mean rate of smoking cessation was 16% in the intervention groups and 9% in the control groups.”
The Costs of Low Birth Weight (2004, neutral): “See Strauss [2000], Matte et al. [2001], Jefferis, Power, and Hertzman [2002], Durousseau and Chavez [2003], Morley et al. [2004], and Behrman and Rosenzweig [2004]. Behrman and Rosenzweig [2001], based on a sample of 404 MZ female twin pairs, find intrapair birth weight effects on educational attai”
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide (2005, methodology): “Mathematics for example has been criticized for fragmentation and for lacking institutions for synthesizing or sharing its work.(57) Physicist John Ziman echoes this: ‘‘Basic scientific knowledge is typically fragmented into little islands of near conformity surrounded by interdisciplinary oceans of”
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Birth Outcomes: A Life-Course Perspective (2003, background): “This may also explain why even the most intensive smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy appear to be only modestly effective (120).”