Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
By Stoyan R. Stoyanov, Leanne Hides, David Kavanagh, Hollie Wilson. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2016
596 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. Objective This study describes the development and reliability testing of an end-user version of the MARS (uMARS). Methods The MARS was simplified and piloted with 13 young people to create the uMARS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the uMARS was then examined in a second sample of 164 young people participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mHealth app. App ratings were collected using the uMARS at 1-, 3,- and 6-month follow up. Results The uMARS had excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90), with high individual alphas for all subscales. The total score and subscales had good test-retest reliability over both 1-2 months and 3 months. Conclusions The uMARS is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be9ca7fa520ca3cdf39064eb7b1977815a33f7ab
Citations in the corpus
- The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study (2019, unknown): “Shortly thereafter, a simpler user version of MARS (uMARS) was created for the general population for the same purpose [37].”