Income, Inequality and Income Mobility

By W. Ultee. 2007

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be99b9ae6afb03cc766e3df8f251aae7266cb235

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Emmanuel Saez
2. Magne Mogstad
3. Daniel Aaronson
4. V. Peragine
5. Rolf Aaberge
6. B. Mazumder
7. Jae Song
8. W. Kopczuk

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Magne Mogstad
2. V. Peragine
3. Daniel Aaronson
4. Rolf Aaberge
5. Emmanuel Saez
6. B. Mazumder
7. Jae Song
8. W. Kopczuk

Citations in the corpus

• Intergenerational Economic Mobility in the United States, 1940 to 2000 (2012, background): “It has often been argued that economic mobility is a relevant concept for economists because an increase in mobility is thought to imply that lifetime income is more equal (Shorrocks 1978).”
• The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey: Selected Findings from Waves 1 to 16 (2018, unknown): “The ‘Shorrocks R’ (Shorrocks, 1978) measure reported in the table perhaps best summarises this persistence.”
• Measuring Long-Term Inequality of Opportunity (2011, background): “1 See e.g. Shorrocks (1978), Chakravarty et al. (1985), Maasoumi and Trede (2001), and Aaberge and Mogstad (2009).”
• Earnings Inequality and Mobility in the United States: Evidence from Social Security Data Since 1937 (2010, methodology): “The annual samples are selected based on a fixed subset of digits of the transformation of the Social Security Number.”