Bank Size, Market Concentration, and Bank Earnings Volatility in the US
By Jakob de Haan, Tigran Poghosyan. 2012
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be691b2fd0c735552ad154a7d12695d06befe4d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Determinants of Net Interest Margins of Commercial Banks in Kenya: A Panel Study (2012, background): “On the other hand, it is easier to monitor a few banks in a concentrated banking system than it is to monitor banks in a diffused banking system and so the interest margins in such markets may not be large (De Haan and Poghosyan, 2012). Most empirical evidence supports the view that concentrated ban”
- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF BANKS: A SURVEY (2016, unknown): “10 Several studies have examined the relationship between size and riskiness of banks and there is some evid nce for the ‘too big to fail’ point of view (see Poghosyan and De Haan, 2012, and De Haan and Poghosyan, 2012 and references cited therein).”
- Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector (2013, unknown): “As our sample consists of large US national commercial banks, the study uses a relative rather than absolute measure to control for bank size (De Haan and Poghosyan 2012; Holder-Webb et al. 2009).”
- Determinants of Bank Profitability—Evidence from Vietnam (2019, unknown): “However, size is important in the sense that it reduces earnings volatility (De Haan and Poghosyan 2012) and large banking sector improves banking profitability (Ting 2017).”