Space time distribution of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi‐oki earthquake: Implications for variations in fault zone frictional properties

By S. Miyazaki, Paul Segall, Junichi Fukuda, T. Kato. 2004

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle (2015, background): “…postseismic deformation following large megathrust ruptures show that nearfield deformation is due to aseismic afterslip (e.g., Baba et al. 2006; Chlieh et al. 2004, 2007; Hutton et al. 2001; Lin et al. 2013; Melbourne et al. 2002; Miyazaki et al. 2004; Ozawa et al. 2012; Perfettini et al. 2010).”
Dynamics of a velocity strengthening fault region: Implications for slow earthquakes and postseismic slip (2008, unknown): “…Landers earthquake [ Savage and Svarc , 1997; Fialko , 2004], the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake [ Hsu et al. , 2002], the 1999 Izmit earthquake [ Burgmann et al. , 2002], the 1995 Antofagasta earthquake [ Chlieh et al. , 2004], and the 2004 Sumatra sequence [ Chlieh et al. , 2007; Hsu et al. , 2006].”
Afterslip and aftershocks in the rate‐and‐state friction law (2007, methodology): “To account for these observations, some researchers invoked either small-scale spatial [Miyazaki et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2006] or temporal [Wennerberg and Sharp, 1997; Hearn et al.”
Statistical physics of fracture, friction, and earthquakes (2011, methodology): “Friction parameters have actually been estimated through comparison of observed data and simulations at California (Johnson et al., 2006) and Japan (Fukuda et al., 2009; Miyazaki et al., 2004) from afterslip data.”