Changes in affect interrelations as a function of stressful events

By A. Zautra, Johannes Berkhof, N. Nicolson. 2002

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be57e05428abc864145af562cfbebb2e79c1c6da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Constantine Sedikides
2. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
3. Martin Lövdén
4. C. Routledge
5. Joost M. Leunissen
6. T. Wildschut
7. Eshkol Rafaeli
8. A. Diamond

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Martin Lövdén
2. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
3. Constantine Sedikides
4. Karin G. Coifman
5. Annette Brose
6. Florian Schmiedek
7. C. Routledge
8. A. Ong

In Social Psychology

1. T. Wildschut
2. Constantine Sedikides
3. C. Routledge
4. Joost M. Leunissen
5. G. Bonanno
6. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
7. Karin G. Coifman
8. Annette Brose

Citations in the corpus

• The Hedonic Character of Nostalgia: An Integrative Data Analysis (2020, background): “However, during times of stress, an attentional shift occurs where negative affect gains priority, resulting in a stronger inverse association between positive and negative affect (Davis et al., 2004; Zautra et al., 2002).”
• Affect dynamics, bereavement and resilience to loss (2007, background): “In an effort to address this issue, Zautra and colleagues propose an integrative model, the Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA) (Zautra et al., 2002; Zautra, 2003; Reich et al., 2003; Davis et al., 2004; see also Pruchno and Meeks, 2004).”
• Resilience and adaptation to stress in later life: Empirical perspectives and conceptual implications (2004, background): “Research on daily events also reveals that negative emotions are not always present in the same degree each time a person experiences stress (Zautra et al., 2002).”
• Differences in the Between–Person and Within–Person Structures of Affect Are A Matter of Degree (2015, background): “Over and above this, the ability to differentiate between PA and NA is a function of stress (Zautra et al., 2002).”
• Understanding The Dual Nature of Ambivalence: Why and When Ambivalence Leads to Good and Bad Outcomes (2017, unknown): “…cope with the long-term pain by widening individuals’ affective space (i.e., decreasing the inverse relationship between positive and negative affect; Zautra et al., 2002; Zautra et al., 2000; Coifman, Bonanno and Rafaeli, 2007; which counters the negative effects of stress such as tunnel vision…”