One Size Does Not Fit All: Comparing NMT Representations of Different Granularities

By Nadir Durrani, Fahim Dalvi, Hassan Sajjad, Yonatan Belinkov, Preslav Nakov. 2019

43 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent work has shown that contextualized word representations derived from neural machine translation are a viable alternative to such from simple word predictions tasks. This is because the internal understanding that needs to be built in order to be able to translate from one language to another is much more comprehensive. Unfortunately, computational and memory limitations as of present prevent NMT models from using large word vocabularies, and thus alternatives such as subword units (BPE and morphological segmentations) and characters have been used. Here we study the impact of using different kinds of units on the quality of the resulting representations when used to model morphology, syntax, and semantics. We found that while representations derived from subwords are slightly better for modeling syntax, character-based representations are superior for modeling morphology and are also more robust to noisy input.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yonatan Belinkov
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Percy Liang
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Nadir Durrani
  6. Hassan Sajjad
  7. Fahim Dalvi
  8. Colin Raffel

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Yonatan Belinkov
  2. Fahim Dalvi
  3. Hassan Sajjad
  4. Nadir Durrani
  5. Colin Raffel
  6. Mihir Kale
  7. Lu Jiang
  8. Rami Al-Rfou

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Yonatan Belinkov
  2. Fahim Dalvi
  3. Hassan Sajjad
  4. Nadir Durrani
  5. Mohit Bansal
  6. Colin Raffel
  7. Graham Neubig
  8. Hinrich Schütze

Citations in the corpus