Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all

By Zhi-Hua Zhou, Jianxin Wu, Wei Tang. 2002

2,013 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Neural network ensemble is a learning paradigm where many neural networks are jointly used to solve a problem. In this paper, the relationship between the ensemble and its component neural networks is analyzed from the context of both regression and classification, which reveals that it may be better to ensemble many instead of all of the neural networks at hand. This result is interesting because at present, most approaches ensemble all the available neural networks for prediction. Then, in order to show that the appropriate neural networks for composing an ensemble can be effectively selected from a set of available neural networks, an approach named GASEN is presented. GASEN trains a number of neural networks at first. Then it assigns random weights to those networks and employs genetic algorithm to evolve the weights so that they can characterize to some extent the fitness of the neural networks in constituting an ensemble. Finally it selects some neural networks based on the evolved weights to make up the ensemble. A large empirical study shows that, compared with some popular ensemble approaches such as Bagging and Boosting, GASEN can generate neural network ensembles with far smaller sizes but stronger generalization ability. Furthermore, in order to understand the working mechanism of GASEN, the bias-variance decomposition of the error is provided in this paper, which shows that the success of GASEN may lie in that it can significantly reduce the bias as well as the variance.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Model Architectures, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Jianfeng Gao
  3. Kyunghyun Cho
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Yoshua Bengio
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Ruslan Salakhutdinov
  8. Han-Jia Ye

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Alan L. Yuille
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Xiaogang Wang
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Bernt Schiele
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Ming-Hsuan Yang

In Model Architectures

  1. J. Kolter
  2. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu
  3. Yuanzhi Li
  4. Yoshua Bengio
  5. Edward Grefenstette
  6. Dan Jurafsky
  7. Jiwei Li
  8. Jianfei Cai

In Optimization & Training

  1. Yuanzhi Li
  2. Zeyuan Allen-Zhu
  3. Ping Luo
  4. Jianfei Cai
  5. Alan L. Yuille
  6. Thomas Elsken
  7. Arber Zela
  8. Lior Rokach

Citations in the corpus