PubChem structure–activity relationship (SAR) clusters

By Sunghwan Kim, Lianyi Han, Bo Yu, Volker Hähnke, Evan E. Bolton, Stephen H. Bryant. 2015

25 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundDeveloping structure–activity relationships (SARs) of molecules is an important approach in facilitating hit exploration in the early stage of drug discovery. Although information on millions of compounds and their bioactivities is freely available to the public, it is very challenging to infer a meaningful and novel SAR from that information.ResultsResearch discussed in the present paper employed a bioactivity-centered clustering approach to group 843,845 non-inactive compounds stored in PubChem according to both structural similarity and bioactivity similarity, with the aim of mining bioactivity data in PubChem for useful SAR information. The compounds were clustered in three bioactivity similarity contexts: (1) non-inactive in a given bioassay, (2) non-inactive against a given protein, and (3) non-inactive against proteins involved in a given pathway. In each context, these small molecules were clustered according to their two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) structural similarities. The resulting 18 million clusters, named “PubChem SAR clusters”, were delivered in such a way that each cluster contains a group of small molecules similar to each other in both structure and bioactivity.ConclusionsThe PubChem SAR clusters, pre-computed using publicly available bioactivity information, make it possible to quickly navigate and narrow down the compounds of interest. Each SAR cluster can be a useful resource in developing a meaningful SAR or enable one to design or expand compound libraries from the cluster. It can also help to predict the potential therapeutic effects and pharmacological actions of less-known compounds from those of well-known compounds (i.e., drugs) in the same cluster.Graphical abstract

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. William A. Catterall
  2. Jie Zheng
  3. M. Trudeau
  4. A. L. Goldin

Citations in the corpus