Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks.
By Antonio Acín, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar, Stefano Pironio, Valerio Scarani. Physical Review Letters, 2007
1,505 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present the optimal collective attack on a quantum key distribution protocol in the "device-independent" security scenario, where no assumptions are made about the way the quantum key distribution devices work or on what quantum system they operate. Our main result is a tight bound on the Holevo information between one of the authorized parties and the eavesdropper, as a function of the amount of violation of a Bell-type inequality.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be2e91a735e4084ea92439f517f4d31713472b0a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Hoi-Kwong Lo
- Jian-Wei Pan
- Xiongfeng Ma
- Ronald Hanson
- Feihu Xu
- Qiang Zhang
- Eleni Diamanti
- Juan Carlos García-Escartín
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Hoi-Kwong Lo
- Jian-Wei Pan
- Xiongfeng Ma
- Ronald Hanson
- Qiang Zhang
- Eleni Diamanti
- Feihu Xu
- Juan Carlos García-Escartín
Citations in the corpus
- Practical challenges in quantum key distribution (2016, neutral): “To regain security in practical QKD, several solutions, including QKD based on testable assumptions, 7 device independent (DI) QKD 97,98 (see also ref.”
- Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres (2015, methodology): “In addition, a loophole-free Bell test is a critical component for device-independent quantum security protocols[20] and randomness certification[21,22].”
- Quantum random number generators (2016, background): “…basic model behind device independent quantum information processing, which started in the context of quantum key distribution with (Mayers and Yao, 1998) and (Barrett et al., 2005) with multiple further developments (Aćın et al., 2007; Colbeck, 2007; Colbeck and Kent, 2011; Magniez et al., 2006).”
- Advances in quantum cryptography (2019, neutral): “[158] A.”
- NetSquid, a NETwork Simulator for QUantum Information using Discrete events (2020, background): “Apart from quantum key distribution (QKD) 45 – 49 and a few select applications 50 – 53 , little is known about the requirements of quantum applications 5 on imperfect hardware.”
- Progress in satellite quantum key distribution (2017, methodology): “This protocol is the precursor of device-independent QKD schemes proposed much more recently [33].”
- Measurements in two bases are sufficient for certifying high-dimensional entanglement (2017, background): “Quantum communication offers advantages such as enhanced security in quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols [1] and increased channel capacities [2] with respect to classical means of communication.”
- Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole (2011, background): “This allows for deviceindependent (DI) secure QKD: the two parties can establish a secret key even if they bought their equipment from an adversary [22].”