Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Bioplastics Production Systems and End-of-Life Options (2018, background): “However, some researchers studied the impacts from acquisition of feedstock to end-of-life (EOL) or ‘cradle-to-grave’ approach [14,16,17].”
Biodegradation of Wasted Bioplastics in Natural and Industrial Environments: A Review (2020, background): “The options for the management of bioplastics at the end of their life are mainly dependent on the physico-chemical conditions of the treatment, and include: Biological waste treatment, recycling, incineration, and landfilling [28,33,64].”
Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review (2020, unknown): “Alvarenga 2013 [5] Gate Y P Y Y Y Y Y Y N Bohlmann 2004 [6] Grave Y P P N N Y Y Y N Chen 2016 [7] Gate Y P Y P P P Y Y N Groot-Boren 2010 [8] Gate Y N Y P Y Y Y Y N Harding 2007 [9] Gate Y P N P P N Y Y N Haylock 2018 [10] Grave Y P N P N Y Y Y N Hottle 2013 [11] Grave Y P P Y Y Y N Hottle 2017 [12]”
Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions (2021, background): “…(e.g. Belboom and Leonard, 2016; Chen et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2013; Durkin et al., 2019; Eerhart et al., 2012; Gironi and Piemonte, 2011; Hottle et al., 2017; Liptow and Tillman, 2012; Papong et al., 2014; Piemonte, 2011; Razza et al., 2015; Semba et al., 2018; Tsiropoulos et al.,…”