Integral transforms for coherent sheaves

By David Ben-Zvi, D. Nadler, Anatoly Preygel. 2013

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The theory of integral, or Fourier-Mukai, transforms between derived categories of sheaves is a well established tool in noncommutative algebraic geometry. General "representation theorems" identify all reasonable linear functors between categories of perfect complexes (or their "large" version, quasi-coherent sheaves) on schemes and stacks over some fixed base with integral kernels in the form of sheaves (of the same nature) on the fiber product. However, for many applications in mirror symmetry and geometric representation theory one is interested instead in the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves (or its "large" version, ind-coherent sheaves), which differs from perfect complexes (and quasi-coherent sheaves) once the underlying variety is singular. In this paper, we give general representation theorems for linear functors between categories of coherent sheaves over a base in terms of integral kernels on the fiber product. Namely, we identify coherent kernels with functors taking perfect complexes to coherent sheaves, and kernels which are coherent relative to the source with functors taking all coherent sheaves to coherent sheaves. The proofs rely on key aspects of the "functional analysis" of derived categories, namely the distinction between small and large categories and its measurement using $t$-structures. These are used in particular to correct the failure of integral transforms on Ind-coherent sheaves to correspond to such sheaves on a fiber product. The results are applied in a companion paper to the representation theory of the affine Hecke category, identifying affine character sheaves with the spectral geometric Langlands category in genus one.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be2660f8da639da4812a8fa4689450a17e8598d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Yankı Lekili
  2. Alexander Polishchuk
  3. Emanuele Macrì
  4. Yuri I. Manin
  5. Arend Bayer
  6. I. Burban
  7. Bernd Kreußler
  8. P. Stellari

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Yankı Lekili
  2. Alexander Polishchuk
  3. Yuri I. Manin
  4. Emanuele Macrì
  5. Arend Bayer
  6. Pierre-Guy Plamondon
  7. Y. Ruan
  8. Tyler Jarvis

Citations in the corpus