Clear and Clean: The Fixed Effects of the Liberal Peace
By J. O'neal, Bruce M. Russett. International Organization, 2001
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be202ca700db0dd4b4bada60143082ec8321c151
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- W. H. Kaempfer
- A. Lowenberg
- J. O'neal
- Bruce M. Russett
- Alan M. Taylor
- Reuven Glick
- Michael Berbaum
- Robert W. Rauchhaus
In Political Science and International Relations
- W. H. Kaempfer
- A. Lowenberg
- J. O'neal
- Bruce M. Russett
- Alan M. Taylor
- Reuven Glick
- Robert W. Rauchhaus
- W. Cole
In Sociology and Political Science
- W. H. Kaempfer
- A. Lowenberg
- J. O'neal
- Bruce M. Russett
- Alan M. Taylor
- Reuven Glick
- Michael Berbaum
- Robert W. Rauchhaus
Citations in the corpus
- The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions (2007, background): “A variant of the democratic peace theory is the liberal peace, which postulates a pacifying effect of trade [see Oneal and Russett (1997, 1999a, 1999b, 2001, 2003), Russett and Oneal (2001), Oneal (2003), Oneal et al. (2003)].”
- Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review (2014, unknown): “50 For an overview of the debate on the desirability of fixed effects compare Green, Kim and Yoon 2001 with Beck and Katz 2001 and O’Neal and Russett 2001.”
- Collateral Damage: Trade Disruption and the Economic Impact of War (2005, background): “For example, Polachek (1980, 1997), Pollins (1989a, b), Oneal, Oneal, Maoz, and Russet (1996), Oneal and Russett (1997, 1999, 2001), Mansfield and Pevehouse (2000), Gartzke and Li (2003), Oneal, Russett, and Berbaum (2003), all find evidence that trade reduces the incidence of conflicts.”
- Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992 (2003, background): “…specifications, the benefits of economically important trade are statistically significant and substantively important even controlling for the history of dyadic disputes (Oneal and Russett 1999a, 1999b, 2001; Bennett and Stam 2000; Hegre 2000; Mousseau 2000; Gartzke, Li, and Boehmer 2001).”