Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting: A Primer
By C. Y. Peng, Tak-Shing Harry So. 2002
329 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be1f8a84f2258480e23ccfd6d0ec2c9bae1e3fc4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Carmen Cadarso-Suárez
- Mónica López-Ratón
- Frances K. Stage
- Edward P. St. John
- María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez
- F. Gude-Sampedro
- C. Y. Peng
- Tak-Shing Harry So
In Statistics and Probability
- Carmen Cadarso-Suárez
- Mónica López-Ratón
- Frances K. Stage
- Edward P. St. John
- María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez
- F. Gude-Sampedro
- C. Y. Peng
- Tak-Shing Harry So
Citations in the corpus
- OptimalCutpoints: An R Package for Selecting Optimal Cutpoints in Diagnostic Tests (2014, methodology): “Consequently, the equality or simultaneous maximization of these two quantities ( "SpEqualSe" and "MaxSpSe" methods in OptimalCutpoints , Riddle and Stratford 1999; Peng and So 2002; Gallop et al. 2003) or the maximization/minimization of a given combination tends to be more appropriate.”
- An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting (2002, background): “This trend mirrors the pattern that was found in higher education journals (Peng et al., 2002, except that the rise of logistic regression began a year earlier, in 1992, in higher education journals.”
- Violence directed against teachers: results from a national survey (2014, methodology): “For further reading on logistic regression analyses, see Peng and So (2002). In our model, the outcome variable, victimization, is a dichotomized variable (1 = Yes, victimization occurred at least once across perpetrators; 0 = No victimization).”
- The Use and Interpretation of Logistic Regression in Higher Education Journals: 1988–1999 (2002, methodology): “Although this information may appear trivial to readers, two recent studies by Peng and So (1999, 2002) have found that six major statistical packages (SAS, SPSS, BMDP, SYSTAT, MINITAB, and STATA) differed in their treatment of modeling strategies.”