Bayes or Bust

By Alan Hájek, Brian Skyrms. 2000

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bde65d6825f2385c72de4a0b13d0a9920d464c2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Christian P. Robert
2. Martin E. P. Seligman
3. Roy F. Baumeister
4. Nicolas Chopin
5. Judith Rousseau
6. P. Railton
7. Chandra Sekhar Sripada
8. Lyle Zynda

Citations in the corpus

• Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past (2013, background): “Miller, Galanter, and Pribam (1960), of much adaptive control theory (Åström & Murray, 2008; see also Carver & Scheier, 1990), and of the Bayesian revolution in contemporary epistemology (Earman, 1992).”
• Resurrecting Logical Probability (2001, background): “That is why a logical probabilist or Bayesian analysis of the Ravens Paradox will rightly help itself to such background information as that black ravens are expected to be rarer than non-black non-ravens (Earman 1992, pp. 70–3; Rosenkrantz 1994).”
• Harold Jeffreys’s Theory of Probability Revisited (2008, background): “See Earman (1992) for a deeper discussion of this point.”
• Representation Theorems and Realism about Degrees of Belief (2000, background): “Howson and Urbach (1989) and Earman (1992) survey and discuss many of these arguments.”