Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes

By J. Alahuhta, J. Heino. 2013

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdd91cd712cb4f58a329fed4cea78315eea01925

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Heino
2. Luis Mauricio Bini
3. T. Erős
4. J. Soininen
5. Adriano S. Melo
6. J. Alahuhta
7. T. Datry
8. Jan Hjort

In Environmental Chemistry

1. T. Erős
2. J. Soininen
3. J. Heino
4. Adriano S. Melo
5. Luis Mauricio Bini
6. T. Datry
7. Dénes Schmera

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Heino
2. J. Soininen
3. T. Erős
4. Luis Mauricio Bini
5. J. Alahuhta
6. Adriano S. Melo
7. T. Datry
8. N. Bonada

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “70 R(2) < 50%, often varying between 0 and 20%) of community variation (Beisner et al. 2006; 71 Nabout et al. 2009; Alahuhta and Heino 2013; Soininen 2014; Heino et al. 2015b), which 72 may simply be due to unmeasured environmental factors, but also to our inability to 73 adequately account for disp”
• Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects (2015, unknown): “In contrast, Alahuhta & Heino (2013) found no positive relationship between spatial structuring and spatial extent in lake macrophytes, although the degree of spatial structuring was specific to a study region.”