Variations in juvenile growth, energy allocation and life-history strategies of two populations of Arctic charr in North Norway

By A. Rikardsen, J. M. Elliott. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Charr Problem Revisited: Exceptional Phenotypic Plasticity Promotes Ecological Speciation in Postglacial Lakes (2010, background): “Anadromous systems (e.g. Kristoffersen et al., 1994; Strand & Heggberget, 1994; Radtke et al., 1996; Rikardsen & Elliott, 2000) but also migratory freshwater systems (Näslund, 1990), where there are size-frequency polymorphisms, probably develop by ontogenetic, environmentally-induced mechanisms,…”
The marine temperature and depth preferences of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and sea trout (Salmo trutta), as recorded by data storage tags (2007, background): “Only 10–50% of post-smolts and 50–80% of fish that have been to sea one or more times before (veterans) survive the sea residency each year (Jensen and Berg, 1977; Berg and Jonsson, 1990; Finstad and Heggberget, 1993; Rikardsen, 2000; Rikardsen and Elliott, 2000).”
Anadromy and residency in steelhead and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a review of the processes and patterns (2015, unknown): “Research on other salmonines suggests that lipid content may better predict physiological opportunities for sexual development (Rikardsen and Elliott 2000; Rikardsen et al. 2004; Thorpe et al. 1998).”
Body size and the adoption of a migratory tactic in brook charr (2003, background): “Comparison of sizes backcalculated to the same time, prior to migration, have rarely been reported (Jonsson, 1985; Svenning et al., 1992; Forseth et al., 1999; Rikardsen & Elliott, 2000).”