A Rose.com by Any Other Name

By Michael J. Cooper, O. Dimitrov, P. Raghavendra Rau, Cooper, Rau Dimitrov, Roberto C. Gutierrez, Ken French. 2001

523 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdd47e00145b078e951f367964e415e67432ba3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Behavioral Corporate Finance: An Updated Survey (2011, unknown): “Catering to Internet sentiment did seem to deliver a short-term price boost: Cooper et al. report a remarkably large average announcement effect of 74% for their main sample, and an even larger effect for the subset that had little true involvement with the Internet. Interestingly, Cooper, Gulen, an”
Investor Psychology in Capital Markets: Evidence and Policy Implications (2001, unknown): “Firms that have changed their names to include ‘dot.com’ have experienced enormous returns, regardless of whether the announcement is associated with reorientation of the business to the web (Cooper, Dimitrov, and Rau (2001)).”
The Stock Market and Corporate Investment: A Test of Catering Theory (2009, background): “For example, Cooper, Dimitrov, and Rau (2001) document that many firms added a .com to their corporate name as internet valuations (and presumably sentiment) rose.”
The Effect of Internet Security Breach Announcements on Market Value: Capital Market Reactions for Breached Firms and Internet Security Developers (2004, methodology): “More recently, the effects of various types of IS-related announcements on capital markets have been examined, including e-commerce initiatives, IT failures, IT investments, dot-com name changes, and newly created CIO positions [10, 18, 23, 40, 70].”
Style Investing and Institutional Investors (2008, background): “21 Fama and French (1992) find that high book-to-market stocks provide higher returns.”
Explosive Behavior in the 1990s Nasdaq: When Did Exuberance Escalate Asset Values? (2011, background): “Examples include Greenspan (1996), Thaler (1999), Shiller (2000), The Economist (2000), Cooper et al. (2001), Ritter and Welch (2002), Ofek and Richardson (2002), Lamont and Thaler (2003), and Cunado et al. (2005).2 Among the many references, the remark by Greenspan (1996) on December 5, 1996, is…”
Investor Attention: Overconfidence and Category Learning (2006, unknown): “For instance, during the Internet bubble period, firms that had changed to dot.com names without any fundamental changes in strategies earned significant abnormal returns around their name-change announcements (Cooper et al., 2001).”
Managerial Actions in Response to a Market Downturn: Valuation Effects of Name Changes in the Dot.com Decline (2005, unknown): “Cooper et al. / Journal of Corporate Finance 11 (2005) 319–335 320”
The Role of Feelings in Investor Decision-Making (2005, unknown): “These anomalies include Cornell’s (2000) analysis of the pricing of Intel and Cooper et al.’s (2001) analysis of the pricing of Internet companies following a name-change. Cornell (2000) investigated an Intel share price drop of 30% on 21st September 2000.”
Attracting investor attention through advertising (2014, background): “…in particular, around equity issues.7 This stand of research documents a substantial increase in 6See, for example, Aboody and Kasznik (2000); Cooper, Dimitrov, and Rau (2001); Baker and Wurgler (2004a,b); Cooper, Gulen, and Rau (2005); Baker, Greenwood, and Wurgler (2008); Polk and Sapienza…”
News or Noise? Internet Postings and Stock Prices (2001, background): “Trueman, Wong, and Zhang (2000) tried to find relationships between Internet company stock prices and accounting information.”
Overconfidence and Speculative Bubbles (2003, unknown): “Cooper, Dimitrov, and Rau (2001) use a sample of 147 firms that changed their names to a dotcom name between June 1998 and July 1999, to document abnormal returns on the order of 53 percent in the five days around the announcement date.”
Does Sentiment Drive the Retail Demand for IPOs? (2009, unknown): “Put simply, retail investors might merely snap up anything that smells like internet (see Cooper et al. (2001)).”