Hope, Hype, and Fear: The Promise and Potential Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice
By William S. Isaac. 2018
23 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- A Causal Bayesian Networks Viewpoint on Fairness (2018, neutral): “This uneven distribution of police attention, as well as other factors such as funding for pretrial services [30, 43], means that differences in base rates be-tween racial groups are not reflective of ground truth rates.”
- Fairness in Machine Learning (2020, background): “In response, Equivant published a technical report [41] refuting the claims of bias made by ProPublica and concluded that COMPAS is sufficiently calibrated, in the sense that it satisfies Predictive Parity at key thresholds.”