Existence and consistency of Wasserstein barycenters
By Thibaut Le Gouic, Jean-Michel Loubes. Probability theory and related fields, 2015
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Based on the Fréchet mean, we define a notion of barycenter corresponding to a usual notion of statistical mean. We prove the existence of Wasserstein barycenters of random probabilities defined on a geodesic space (E, d). We also prove the consistency of this barycenter in a general setting, that includes taking barycenters of empirical versions of the probability measures or of a growing set of probability measures.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdc4675873b229615d3e6ecf461500e869d2a8e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Victor M. Panaretos
- Yoav Zemel
- Julio D. Backhoff Veraguas
- Joaquín Fontbona
- Felipe A. Tobar
- Gonzalo Rios
- Vladimir Spokoiny
- Alexandra L. Suvorikova
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Victor M. Panaretos
- Yoav Zemel
- Vladimir Spokoiny
- Alexandra L. Suvorikova
- Alexey Kroshnin
- Joaquín Fontbona
- Felipe A. Tobar
- Gonzalo Rios
Citations in the corpus
- A fixed-point approach to barycenters in Wasserstein space (2015, background): “This appealing concept shows a high potential for application, already considered in Artificial Intelligence or in Statistics (see, e.g., [16], [5], [10], [20], [7] or [3]).”
- Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distances (2018, methodology): “The general consistency result of Le Gouic & Loubes (2017) is the important and necessary first step in providing a sound statistical theory for random measures in Wasserstein space.”
- Convergence rates for empirical barycenters in metric spaces: curvature, convexity and extendable geodesics (2018, background): “…of these algorithmic successes and the behavior of some statistical procedures in general (we refer to Bhattacharya and Patrangenaru, 2003; Kendall and Le, 2011; Le Gouic and Loubes, 2017; Altschuler et al., 2017; Dvurechensky et al., 2018; Bigot et al., 2018, for works in this direction).”
- Statistical inference for Bures–Wasserstein barycenters (2019, methodology): “The original Bures metric appears in quantum mechanics in relation to fidelity measure between two quantum states and is used for measurement of quantum entanglement Marian and Marian (2008); Dajka et al.”
- Bayesian Learning with Wasserstein Barycenters (2018, methodology): “Let us now recall the Wasserstein barycenter, introduced in [1] and further studied in [35, 25, 28], among others.”